Techniques For Graphing Lines: Using Intercepts, Using Slope

February 24, 2010 at 7:01 am 2 comments

Last week I spent Wednesday covering graphing lines by finding x- and y-intercepts. I then covered graphing lines using the slope and y-intercept on Thursday. Students love to graph lines using slope because it is so accessible conceptually. If you understand what the slope of a line tells you (up or down so many units as you move this many units to the right), all that’s required to graph the line is the ability to plot a y-intercept and the ability to count (to the next point).

When students are presented two techniques, they will always drift to the technique they feel is easier and often ignore the other technique. However, there are times (equations in standard form: Ax + By = C) when finding the intercepts will be a more efficient way to graph the line. I spent Monday putting up equations in standard form and slope-intercept form, as well as equations of vertical and horizontal lines, and discussing how to efficiently graph the lines.

If an equation is presented in standard form, the algebra required to find the two intercepts can be done mentally. When finding the x-intercept by setting y = 0, the term containing y will disappear. At that point finding the x-intercept turns into a division problem. The same holds true when finding the y-intercept. Students are less likely to make an error in this fashion that solving the equation for y in order to graph using the slope. This is especially true when the coefficient of the y term is negative.

Don’t get me wrong. Students need to be able to find the slope of a line by solving the equation for y, especially later in the course when trying to determine whether two lines are parallel, perpendicular, or neither. What I am saying is that students should possess the critical thinking skills to determine which technique is the most efficient one for graphing a particular line. This comes up again in solving systems of two equations in two unknowns. There are times when substitution is more efficient than elimination, and vice versa. Students should not turn their back on substitution because elimination is “easier” for them. Although the quadratic formula can be used to solve any quadratic equation, students should realize when another technique (factoring, extracting square roots, completing the square) is more efficient.

After Monday’s class, I think my students have a complete strategy for graphing lines, no matter what form they are presented in. I think that they are now able to look at a situation and determine an optimal strategy for graphing a line, and solving a problem in general. I think that their graphing tool box contains all the necessary tools, and that they know when to use each of them. That was a good day.

-George

I am a math instructor at College of the Sequoias in Visalia, CA. Each Wednesday I post a general teaching article on my blog. If you have a question or a comment, please let me know. You can reach me through the contact page on my website – http://georgewoodbury.com.

Advertisements

Entry filed under: General Teaching, Math. Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .

Study Skills – Reading A Math Textbook (Activity) Which Tool Can Be Better Utilized To Help Students Prepare For An Exam – Facebook Or Twitter?

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. David  |  February 24, 2010 at 2:46 pm

    It’s also worth mentioning that these techniques will be needed for later topics. Students will need to find x-intercepts when they are graphing nonlinear functions. Elimination is sufficient for solving systems of linear equations, but they will need substitution to solve nonlinear systems. The quadratic formula solves all quadratic equations, but completing the square is useful for other purposes, such as graphing circles or integrating a rational function. Not every quadratic equation can be solved by factoring, but factoring is useful for equations of higher degree, and it is has great conceptual importance. Teaching multiple techniques at the outset will give students tools they need to succeed in more advanced classes.

    Reply
  • 2. georgewoodbury  |  February 24, 2010 at 2:50 pm

    Well said David. Our students cannot see into the future to know that they will need to be adept with multiple approaches. That’s why it is up to us to help them to be well rounded and to stress critical thinking and problem solving.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,501 other followers

February 2010
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Categories


%d bloggers like this: